The Liaison Practice — Mining · Pipelines & Energy · Forestry
Credible engagement cannot be claimed. It has to be carried in.
Every proponent says they are committed to Indigenous partnership. Nations have heard it for decades, and they can tell the difference in one meeting. What actually moves a project — a mine, a pipeline, a transmission line, a forestry operation — is a liaison who already holds the relationships, knows how Nation decision-making works, and has a thirty-year record on both sides of the table. That is what Willow-ICS is retained to bring.
One competency. Every resource sector.
The engagement discipline is the same whether the asset is a deposit, a right-of-way, or a cut block. What changes is the regulatory pathway, the project lifecycle, and the shape of the Nation's opportunity — and we speak all three.
Mining & Mineral Development
From early exploration relationships through development-stage partnership and IBA negotiation — in the middle of the critical-minerals moment, where consent is the schedule.
Pipelines, Energy & Linear Infrastructure
Corridor projects cross many territories and demand many simultaneous relationships. Your team knows the corridor — we bring the deep regional relationships across Central Canada that a national roster rarely reaches, plugged directly into your existing Indigenous-relations function.
Forestry & Natural Resources
Long-horizon tenure and harvest operations where durable community partnership, employment pathways, and revenue sharing determine whether the operation runs for decades or stalls in year two — a sector Darrel has worked first-hand across a thirty-year resource career.
If you're frustrated, it doesn't mean you're doing it wrong.
Here is what rarely gets said out loud in this space: many proponents have done everything right — proper consultation, genuine offers, real respect — and still found engagement slow, unpredictable, and sometimes adversarial. Some proponents carry a past issue they have long since learned from — and still hear about it in the first meeting. From the Nation's side of the table, raising it is due diligence, not hostility. Both things are true. From the C-suite and principals of established producers to the senior managers and junior exploration teams doing engagement day to day, that frustration is real. It is also not a sign that anyone at today's table is the villain: it is what happens when two governance systems, two clocks, and a history of broken commitments — one that Nations carry and proponents inherit — converge on a single project schedule.
The difficulty is structural — which means it is solvable, but not by more patience or louder goodwill. It is solved by a translator both sides already trust, who can tell each party the things the other cannot say credibly. Our advice to Nations is the same in every room: engage as owners and partners, with real structure and real advice — because that is the counterparty serious projects are built with. And our advice to proponents is a straight read on pace, process, and history, so goodwill lands where it actually builds the relationship.
And the moment favours both sides getting this right. With critical-minerals and priority-project designations moving through Ottawa and the provinces, these projects are national priorities that need to advance — and building them in genuine partnership is what economic reconciliation, the standard the TRC's Call to Action 92 set for corporate Canada, actually looks like in practice. Partnership structure is a spectrum — benefit agreements, employment and procurement commitments, revenue sharing, and equity participation — and we say the same thing about it to both sides. Equity is not right for every project: dilution is real money over the life of a mine, and we treat it that way. So are the years lost to litigation, opposition, and standstill. Where a Nation seeks ownership, we structure it to work, because the record is clear that projects built on real partnership are the ones that finance and endure — and where equity does not serve the project or the Nation, we say that too. The right structure is the one that prices both columns honestly for your specific project, and making that calculation early is precisely the work we are retained to do.
Durable social license — in a repeated game.
Consultation is a legal duty. Free, prior and informed consent — the UNDRIP standard now embedded in federal law — is the bar serious projects plan to. And partnership is the business outcome that clears it. They are not the same thing, and projects fail in the gaps between them. A consultation file can be technically complete while the relationship underneath it is dead — and a dead relationship surfaces at the worst possible moment: at permitting, at financing, at construction.
The same Nations recur across projects and regions, and reputations travel between them faster than any proponent expects. An agreement that a community later regrets is not a closed deal — it is a liability that reprices your next three projects. That is why durability is not the soft part of this practice. Durability is the engineering. A deal both sides would sign again in ten years is the only deal worth signing now.
Willow-ICS declines engagements that fail the ten-year test — a deal both sides would sign again a decade on. We have done it, and the fees went with them. That willingness is the guarantee the service is real.
From first contact to signed agreement — and after.
Engagements are scoped to the project stage. Most begin with a defined scoping mandate and continue as an ongoing liaison retainer through key milestones.
Engagement Strategy & Protocol Navigation
Protocol guidance, relationship groundwork, and a realistic engagement plan built around how Nation governance actually decides — with a schedule your board can rely on, and a proponent prepared to show up right.
Consultation & Accommodation Support
Navigation of Crown consultation processes and proponent-side engagement obligations, coordinated with your regulatory and legal teams.
Impact Benefit Agreement Support
IBA negotiation support that produces agreements both sides can live with — benefits structures, employment and procurement commitments, and implementation mechanics that survive signing day.
Joint Venture & Equity Structuring
Nation participation structures — joint ventures, limited partnerships, and equity pathways — designed to qualify for Indigenous-equity financing programs and to hold up under community scrutiny.
Consultation Records & Reporting
Structured engagement tracking that captures every conversation, commitment, and follow-up — producing a consultation record that stands up to regulators, funders, and time — built for both parties, because every commitment documented is a commitment the Nation can hold the project to.
Ongoing Community Relations
The relationship does not end at signing. Ongoing liaison support keeps commitments visible, communication open, and small issues small.
Willow-ICS is not a law firm or financial advisor. Services involve navigation, facilitation, and connection to qualified specialists — not legal or financial advice.
Both sides of the table. Thirty years. One standard.
The relationships are real.
Chief-and-Council-level relationships across Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Treaty 3 territory, and Northwestern Ontario — built through a thirty-year career of delivery, not business development. In this market there is no substitute and no shortcut.
The experience is two-sided.
Senior deal and delivery experience on the community side and the industry side — including mine site reclamation, environmental remediation, and oil and gas operations. We know what each side of the table needs, fears, and means.
The incentive is aligned.
Willow's entire practice depends on Nations continuing to trust us. We cannot afford to help a proponent push through a deal a community will regret — which is exactly why our word carries weight at both tables.
Defined mandate first. Retainer when it's earned.
No proponent should sign an open-ended engagement with an advisor they haven't worked with — and no advisor worth retaining asks for one.
Discovery conversation
A confidential call on your project, its stage, the Nations in scope, and whether Willow-ICS is the right fit. Thirty minutes, no commitment.
Defined scoping mandate
A fixed-scope, fixed-fee engagement — typically 60 to 90 days, and typically in the low-to-mid five figures — producing an engagement strategy, community and leadership landscape, risk assessment, and a recommended pathway. You see exactly how we work before committing further.
Liaison retainer
Ongoing monthly liaison support through engagement, negotiation, and agreement — with success milestones defined up front so the incentives stay aligned with outcomes, not hours.
Implementation & records
Post-agreement liaison, commitment tracking, and consultation-record systems that keep the partnership performing and the file defensible.
When the project needs more than engagement.
For development-stage assets, Willow-ICS extends past liaison into owner-side delivery — the structuring, planning, and management capacity that moves a project from concept toward development while the partnership work proceeds in step. Where the mandate calls for it, Darrel Olson serves as an embedded senior member of the owner's team — engagement, partnership, and development-phase planning capacity working alongside the technical and financial leads the project requires.
Scoping Mandates
Defined 60–90 day engagements that produce the development-phase picture: stakeholder and rights-holder landscape, engagement strategy, risk assessment, and a costed recommended pathway.
Management Team & Development Planning
Management-team design and build-out, development-phase budgeting, and delivery planning — including senior service on the owner's team where a project needs development capacity stood up alongside the deal.
Partnership & Equity Architecture
Nation participation structures designed to qualify for Indigenous-equity financing programs and hold up under community scrutiny — the difference between a project that finances and one that doesn't.
The standard does not change when industry pays.
When Willow-ICS arrives with a proponent, that is not a signal to lower your guard — it is a signal that the proponent agreed to be held to a standard. Every industry engagement we accept is conditional on terms that pass the ten-year test — a deal both sides would sign again a decade on — and we decline the ones that do not. Our commitments to Nation-directed process, community control, and value retention are structural, and they apply on every file, whoever pays the invoice.
Read our published conflict rules →
What Willow-ICS does for First Nations →
Talk to us before the project needs it.
The best engagement work happens early — before positions harden and schedules compress. A confidential thirty-minute conversation is the right first step.
Request a Conversation